New York's Expansive Definition of a "Franchise": Trademarks Not Required
The definition of a franchise and the factors utilized to evaluate the existence of a franchise have important implications. That is, does the business arrangement providing for the multi-unit expansion of your business qualify as a franchise and thereby subject you to franchise regulations and disclosure requirements? The answer to this question depends on the "substance" of the business relationship and an evaluation of both federal and state law.
For the "New York franchisor" (comprised of any business - based in any state - seeking to offer or sell a franchise in the State of New York) the definition of what constitutes a "franchise" is more expansive that the federal definition. Under the Federal Franchise Rule "trademarks" and "trademark licenses" are primary and critical components of a franchise system. Without the license of a trademark, under federal law, a "franchise" does not exist. Under New York law however, the existence of a franchise is not dependent upon the existence of a trademark license. That is, although your "business arrangement" does not involve a trademark license and therefore does not qualify as a "franchise" under federal law, you may nevertheless be subject to New York's franchise regulations and disclosure requirements if your "business arrangement" is based on a written or oral agreement providing for:
- (i) A Proscribed Marketing Plan or System: The offer, sale or distribution of goods or services under a proscribed marketing plan or system; and
- (ii) Payment of a Franchise Fee: The direct or indirect payment of a "franchise fee". What qualifies as a "franchise fee" is also expansively defined and may include license fees and other charges associated with the business transaction.
Additionally, New York offers an alternative definition of a franchise replacing the "proscribed marketing plan" requirement (point (i) , above) with a "trademark license".
So, under New York law, unlike federal law, although the existence of a "trademark license" may give rise to a "franchise relationship" it is not mandatory. In the State of New York franchises and franchise relationships are not dependent upon the existence of trademarks and trademark licenses.
The typical franchise agreement is representative of the disproportionate bargaining power between the franchisor and franchisee. That is, franchise agreements favor franchisors. One such favorable clause contained in franchise and license agreements relates to "liquidated damages".
If you are researching the benefits of franchising, buying a franchise or starting a franchise, chances are that you have come across articles and promotional materials discussing the benefits of a "proven franchise system". That is, prospective franchisees are advised that if they become a franchisee of a particular franchise they will benefit from a "proven system". While this vague term is used often and claimed by almost all franchisors, not every franchisor possesses legitimate systems and not every franchise system is "proven".
For the first time franchise or business purchaser "due diligence" is critical. Although the term "due diligence" may sound odd or out of place, it simply refers to the "pre-purchase / pre-investment investigation" that you undertake before signing a franchise agreement or business purchase agreement. In his article 

