Franchisors: How to Approach the Enforcement of Your Restrictive Covenants When Negotiating a Franchisee Renewal
When a franchise agreement expires, franchisors and franchisees, many times, enter a decision making period to determine, discuss and negotiate whether or not the the franchise agreement will be renewed. Although not preferred, this post-termination negotiating period is sometimes necessitated by on-going negotiations and delayed decisions. During this critical negotiating period - one where the franchisee is, most likely, operating the franchised business without a franchise agreement - franchisors, many times, unnecessarily jeopardize the protection of their trademarks and trade dress by failing to require the Franchisee sign what should be a mandatory acknowledgment.
- The Scenario - Franchise agreement expires and franchisor and franchisee negotiate the potential renewal. During the "post-termination negotiations" the franchisee continues to operate the franchised business and continues to utilize the franchisor's trademarks and trade dress. Although the Franchisor does not expressly acknowledge the franchisees continued operation, the franchisor does not continue with the enforcement of the franchise agreement's post-termination restrictive covenants.
- The Problem that Arises - By permitting the franchisee to continue operations - without the benefit of an on-going franchise agreement - the franchisor is legally acquiescing to the franchisees technical infringement of the franchise systems trademarks and trade dress. In doing so, the franchisor weakens its marks and makes later enforcement of the franchisee's post termination restrictive covenants more difficult. While this "problem" is, typically, not fatal, it is nevertheless costly. Especially where negotiations break down and the franchisee continues to violate the restrictive covenants.
- The Solution - During this gap negotiating period, insist that the franchisee sign an agreement whereby the franchisee acknowledges that the franchisor is withholding enforcement of the post-termination restrictive covenants for a limited period of time, i.e., two weeks
The foregoing "problem" is not that great but it is an issue that "muddies the water" in franchisor and franchisee litigation and results in unnecessary legal fees and time. That is, rather than advancing the franchisors right to restrict the former franchisees future business operations, the franchisor is exposed to the frivolous defense that, somehow, the franchisor acquiesced and waived its right to enforce the post-termination covenants.
When it comes to identifying the "governing documents" that serve as the the infrastructure for a franchise system, it is extremely difficult to overstate the significance of a franchisor's "operations manual" and the critical role that it serves. Designed to inject a form of flexibility into the franchisor - franchisee relationship (compared to the static terms contained in the franchise agreement) the operations manual (if properly referenced and identified in the franchise agreement) the operations manual should serve as a critical vehicle to enable you to consistently refine, further develop and modify (within reason) the components of the franchise system and the day-to-day obligations of franchisees.
I am a firm believer in the efficiencies and economies of scale that may result from operating multiple franchise units. Provided that you are a dedicated business person and that you are operating within a solid franchise system, the advantage and benefit of operating multiple franchise locations may be substantial. Of course, if things are not going well, owning and operating "multiple units" may serve to double or triple your difficulties. If you are a prospective franchisee considering the potential investment in a multi-unit franchise opportunity (i.e., where you obtain the "right and obligation" to develop more than one franchise unit with a proscribed geographic territory) you must carefully consider and evaluate the advantages, if any, that will result from any potential “mult-unit opportunity”.
Many times, "start-up" franchisors (and, too often, some established franchisors) overlook the necessity of maintaining a thorough operations manual that is both "current and relevant" to the particular franchise system. That is, many times operations manuals are viewed as an "afterthought" or a"generic" obligation to be sourced out to third party vendors.
For the start-up and established franchisor alike, as your franchise system evolves continuous consideration must be given to your franchise agreement and "the legal rights that you reserve for your franchise system". That is, basic to every franchise agreement are the "reservation clauses" identifying and establishing alternative channels of distribution and legal rights that are not granted, conveyed or licensed to your franchisees. These reserved rights typically address alternative channels of distribution and markets that are expressly reserved to the franchisor. Examples include internet sales, mail order sales, captive market accounts and licensed products sold through alternative sales channels.
In a comment to a recent post -
Below are five steps / factors / issues that you should be considering and evaluating before investing in a franchise. There are many more than five, but the following is a start.
Answer? Yes - but not right away. 

