Multi-Unit Franchise Expansion: Area Developers, Area Representatives and a Word of Caution
Methods for achieving solid and sustainable levels of "multi-unit" franchise system growth and expansion are typically achieved through one or a combination of the following development models: (a) Area Development Agreements, (b) Area Representative Agreements, and (c) Master Franchise Agreements. Although there is no definitive formula as to the structure of each respective model, franchisors and their legal counsel must be aware of the core characteristics of each model and the associated FDD disclosure obligations. Most significantly, franchisors need to proceed with caution and be aware that there is significant conflict between the Federal Franchise Rule and a multitude of state franchise laws as to the treatment of these development models. For example, what constitutes and qualifies as an "Area Representative Relationship" under the Federal Franchise Rule, may constitute and be deemed a "Master Franchise Relationship" under state franchise laws.
The following is a brief review of these development models and some factors that franchisors should consider:
- Area Development Agreements. Area Development Agreements afford franchisees the obligation and right to establish and operate multiple franchise units within a proscribed territory. In its most common form, an Area Development Agreement affords a franchisee, in exchange for a "development fee" (which is separate and apart from a franchise fee), the obligation and right to develop a proscribed number of individual franchise units within a defined territory. The Area Development Agreement will identify the development schedule and, in certain instances, provide the franchisee with a discount on initial franchise fees.
Some Factors to Consider: Area Development Agreements have become extremely common and serve as a useful tool in accommodating multi-unit sales to owner-operator franchisees. The Area Development Agreement serves as a supplement to the franchise agreement and as each franchise unit is developed the franchisee will be required to sign the franchisors current franchise agreement. Area Development Agreements must be separately disclosed in your FDD.
- Area Representative Agreements. Area Representative Agreements - unlike Area Development Agreements - do not relate to the area representatives "establishment and operation" of franchise units but, rather, to the area representatives obligation and right to sell franchises to third-parties within a proscribed territory. In many instances an area representative serves a sales and training function on behalf of the franchisor. Although area representatives are not granted the authority to sign franchise agreements, they are responsible for franchise system sales and training within the proscribed territory. Area representatives receive compensation in the form of a percentage of the franchise fees and royalties generated from franchisees in the proscribed territory
Some Factors to Consider: I do not reccomend Area Representative Agreements for the "start-up franchisor". However foir well established franchise systems - with the necessary procedures and controls - Area Representative Agreements may serve as an important tool for system growth and, basically, outsourcing of administrative and managerial obligations.
Caution: When dealing with Area Representative Agreements and relationships, franchisors must be aware that information about the area representative and the area representatives role and obligations must be extensively disclosed in the FDD , and (ii) Many states treat "area
representatives" as "Master Franchisors / Subfranchisors" and require that prior to offering, selling or engaging in the sale of a franchise that the area representative must disclose the prospective franchisee with the area representatives own FDD - in addition to the franchisor's FDD.
Master Franchise / Sub-Franchise Agreements. Master Franchise Agreements are more commonly utilized by franchisors in instances involving international expansion. Under a Master Franchise Agreement, the Master Franchisee is granted the affirmative right to not only sell franchises within a proscribed territory, but to also sign the franchise agreement. That is, the Franchisor is not a party to the franchise agreement between the Master Franchisee /Sub- Franchisor. Effectively, many of the franchisors rights are assigned to the Master Franchisee / Sub-Franchisor with regard to the designated territory.
Caution: Based on factors of litigation exposure and franchise system growth, in most instances the master franchise expansion model is inappropriate for domestic United States franchise expansion. Master franchise agreements and relationships require extensive disclosures within the franchisor's own FDD and the Master Franchisees separate FDD that must be disclosed to prospective franchisees. Master franchise relationships require dual disclosures to prospective franchisees.
When applied and implemented appropriately, each of the foregoing models may serve as a useful tool for franchise system growth and development.
For the start-up and established franchisor alike, as your franchise system evolves continuous consideration must be given to your franchise agreement and "the legal rights that you reserve for your franchise system". That is, basic to every franchise agreement are the "reservation clauses" identifying and establishing alternative channels of distribution and legal rights that are not granted, conveyed or licensed to your franchisees. These reserved rights typically address alternative channels of distribution and markets that are expressly reserved to the franchisor. Examples include internet sales, mail order sales, captive market accounts and licensed products sold through alternative sales channels.
Below are five steps / factors / issues that you should be considering and evaluating before investing in a franchise. There are many more than five, but the following is a start.
Part of the
When purchasing an "existing business" (whether a franchised or independent operation) prospective purchasers are faced with the critically important task of conducting a "
For the "start-up franchisor" (and even established franchisors) determining the appropriate franchise fee and royalty structure for your franchise system is a critical task that will have long standing implications. The fee structure that you establish will serve as the primary source of revenue for your franchise system and will represent one of the most significant "expenses and obligations" on the part of your franchisees. Set the fees to high and you risk franchisee and, ultimately, franchise system failure. Set the fees too low and you risk "franchise system" failure resulting from your inability (as the franchisor) to properly support, develop and expand your system.
Recently on satellite radio I listened to a radio advertisement, allegedly, by a national franchisor promoting the resale of what I believe to be previously closed franchise locations. The franchisor is allegedly Quiznos and this morning I checked out their .jpg)
Recently, in my article
Driving into the office this morning I listened to a radio commercial that I found to be repulsive . The commercial was not political, did not contain any profane language and, quite possibly, did not contain any false statements. Nevertheless, the information conveyed in this commercial (really just a bunch of self-serving platitudes) could do harm to the unprepared.
If you are considering the purchase of a franchise it is critical to recognize that your "investment" goes beyond - well beyond - initial franchise fees and startup expenses. While franchise fees and start-up expenses (such as equipment purchases and "build-out") are critical expenses that must be evaluated, they only tell half the story. That is, when signing a franchise agreement you will be committing yourself to a serious of legal obligations that will involve the commitment of your time, future financial resources and legal obligations for many years to come.
The typical franchise agreement is representative of the disproportionate bargaining power between the franchisor and franchisee. That is, franchise agreements favor franchisors. One such favorable clause contained in franchise and license agreements relates to "liquidated damages".
For the first time franchise or business purchaser "due diligence" is critical. Although the term "due diligence" may sound odd or out of place, it simply refers to the "pre-purchase / pre-investment investigation" that you undertake before signing a franchise agreement or business purchase agreement. In his article
Recently I came across an article written by an attorney discussing the benefits of buying a franchise in the current economic climate. The assertion raised in the article (an assertion that I completely disagree with) was that now is a good time to invest in a franchise because "in today's economic climate many franchisor's are willing to negotiate and discount their franchise fee".
Answer? Yes - but not right away. 

