Franchisors: Do your Environmental Marketing Claims Comply with FTC Rules?

Proceeding with the ever increasing and costly regulation on business (a separate issue better suited for a publication on politics) the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued "guidelines" respecting the use of environmental claims in advertising and marketing. Considering that many franchisors and other businesses rely on environmental claims in their advertising and packaging franchisors, franchise lawyers and all business owners need to be aware of these "guidelines".

So what are some of the basics that you need to know?

(a) Guidelines. Although identified as administrative "guidelines" as opposed to new enacted regulations it is clear that the FTC will be utilizing existing law and regulation to enforce its environmental labeling requirements.

(b) Ambiguity. The guidelines are indeed ambiguous and leave much to be interpreted. As such, implementation of environmental marking claims must be planned out with your franchise attorney and general counsel.

(c) Advertising Standards. There are many components to the FTC guidelines, but some of the base elements that you must be aware of include: 

Scientific Proof. When making claims like "100% ____ Free" or "Made from Recycled Materials" the FTC Guidelines require that you base these claims on scientific evidence. An example would be to have the product tested and to maintain records of the scientific company. Basically requiring you to test the product and to maintain records of the results.

Recycling Claims. The FTC guidelines require substantial qualification and evaluation of recycling claims. When claiming a product to be made from recycled materials, among other things, you must qualify the nature and volume of the recycled components. For example:

Unqualified claims of recycled content may be made if the entire product or package, excluding minor incidental components, is made from recycled material. For products or packages that are only partially made of recycled material, a recycled claim should be adequately qualified to avoid consumer deception about the amount, by weight, of recycled content in the finished product or package.

Environmental Attribute Claims. The FTC guidelines also focus on and seek to prevent what the FTC refers to as the "overstatement of environmental attribute". So product and packaging claims "should not be presented in a manner that overstates the environmental attribute or benefit expressly or by implication.

Not only is this a tough standard - i.e. one that deals with both express and "implied" marketing statement - but also one that is ambiguous. The FTC does, fortunately, offer some examples of misleading claims.

Example 1: offered by the FTC, provides some insight into application of these guidelines;

Example 2: A package is labeled "50% more recycled content than before". The manufacturer increased the recycled content of its package from 2 percent recycled material to 3 percent recycled material. Although the claim is technicoally true it is likely to convey the false impression that the advertiser has increased significantly the use of recyled material.

Prior to finalizing product labels, packaging and advertising materials it is important to evaluate the FTC guidelines. Franchisors, franchise lawyers and general counsel should establish a set program for identifying and evaluating environmental claims and establish written procedures as to each claim.

Franchise System Marketing: Factors to Consider when Structuring a Sweepstakes

Customer promotions / "sweepstakes" are a popular marketing tool for promoting franchise systems sales and growth. However when considering the implementation of these marketing programs, franchisors and lawyers need to be aware of "hidden pitfalls" and regulations associated with both federal and state regulation.   Recently when discussing this issue with Kenneth A. Goss, Esq. - an in-house franchise to a national franchisor - Mr. Goss raised some interesting points that I believed would be helpful to our readers.  The following is Mr. Goss'  guest post on this important topic:

(Guest Post: Kenneth A. Goss, Esq.) The issue of franchise system promotions involving "consumer oriented" sweepstakes is an issue that franchisors and franchise lawyers must carefully evaluate and are a powerful and effective marketing tool franchisors often used to increase franchise system sales of its product. However, a franchisor that does not comply with applicable law risks possible litigation, administrative action and criminal penalties if,  for example, the franchisors seemingly innocuous sweepstakes turns out to be an illegal lottery governed by state gambling laws.  The following is a brief overview of some of the important factors that franchisors should consider before conducting a sweepstakes.

A sweepstakes is defined by federal law as a game of chance for which no consideration is required to enter. Typically, franchisors use sweepstakes to incentives consumers to buy a particular product by offering customers a chance to win a prize. There is no single uniform law applicable to sweepstakes. Instead, franchisors interested in conducting a nationwide sweepstakes face having to comply with both federal law and the law in each state where the sweepstakes will be conducted.

A starting point in evaluating a sweepstakes is the federal Deceptive Mail Prevention and Enforcement Act (the "DMPEA"). The DMPEA applies to sweepstakes entries sent through the mail, which, in most cases, is necessary to satisfy the "no consideration" element of a sweepstakes. The DMPEA states that any sweepstake entry is deemed "non-mailable" if it does not "clearly and conspicuously" disclose certain information including, among other things, the terms and conditions, the sponsor and sponsor's address, the odds of winning, and all relevant particulars about the prize(s) being offered. The DMPEA gives district courts the authority to enjoin a franchisor that fails to comply.

After evaluating the DMPEA, franchisors and franchise legal counsel must evaluate applicable law in each state in which the franchisor intends to conduct the sweepstakes. While state law will vary, at a minimum, franchisors will be required  to issue official rules and disclose the terms and conditions of the sweepstakes. Florida, New York and Rhode Island each require sponsors of sweepstakes to register with the state if the total retail value of all the prizes is greater than a certain dollar threshold. Florida and New York also require the posting of a bond and submission of winner lists. California and Texas regulate sweepstakes to the point where compliance in those states may be cost prohibitive to most franchisors. In each case, records must be kept in accordance with applicable law.

State laws applicable to sweepstakes vary widely from state to state. The good news for franchisors is that many of the requirements overlap, meaning that a franchisor with a properly structured sweepstakes can be compliant in more than one jurisdiction and realize the marketing benefits that sweepstakes can have for a franchise system. 

Information about Kenneth A. Goss, Esq. and Disclaimer.