New York Franchise Law Blog : Franchise Lawyer & Attorney Charles N. Internicola, Providing National Representation of Franchisees and Franchisors

As franchise counsel I am a strong proponent of “disclosure” – the more of it, the better. Quality disclosures contained in your FDD serve a critical role in mitigating future litigation risk and expense. So, when it comes to FDD disclosure exemptions, we typically proceed with extreme caution. Nevertheless, in the appropriate circumstance, franchisors should consider or at least be aware of potential tools available to them when it comes to available exemptions to the disclosure mandates of the Federal Franchise Rule.

One "grouping" of potential FDD disclosure exemptions relate to transactions involving sophisticated investors, insiders and large franchise investments. These "potential" exemptions, should be evaluated and considered under the following circumstances:

• "Large Franchise Investment". The "Large Franchise Investment" exemption applies to franchise transactions involving a franchisee initial investment  of at least $1 million exclusive of unimproved land and franchisor (including affiliates) financing.  Application of this exemption is dependent upon an analysis of the transaction, satisfaction of the dollar volume criteria and the requirement that the franchisee sign a disclosure acknowledging that the franchise sale was exempt from the Franchise Rule.

• "Large Franchisee Entities". The "Large Franchisee Exemption" applies to franchise sales transactions involving prospective franchisees that are corporate entities, possess a minimum net worth of $5 million and possess no less that 5 years of prior business experience.  By combining both net worth and prior business experience requirements, this exemption is intentionally limited corporate franchisees that possess a predicate level of sophistication.

• "Insiders of the Franchisor". The "Insider Exemption" applies to franchise sales to the owners, directors, and managers of the predecessor entity of the franchisor.  That is, this exemption applies to the officers, owners and managers of a business before it became a franchisor.  These prospective franchisees must possess at least two years experience in the franchisors business and, at the time of becoming a franchisee, have maintained their insider status.These "sophisticated investor" exemptions are an important tool for franchisors to consider and beware of One such exemption relates to “Large Franchisees”.

The foregoing "sophisticated investor" exemptions constitute a critical tool for franchisors to be aware of when planning certain non-traditional franchise sales transactions and when evaluating potential litigation strategy.  Application of the foregoing exemptions requires a fact specific analysis of factors and legal criteria - including applicable rules and regulations associated with each exemption) .  The key, however, is to be aware of this potential "tool". 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

“Franchising” has been and remains one of the most successful vehicles for the multi-unit expansion of a business. However, for many entrepreneurs looking to expand their business and brand,“franchising” is too often disregarded as a viable business model. For these entrepreneurs, the establishment of a franchise system (unnecessarily) appears to be a daunting task and is disregarded in favor of “licensing”. That is, in an “attempted” effort to avoid franchise regulation, but nevertheless achieve brand growth, the entrepreneur (as a “licensor”) licenses his or her trade name and trademarks to third parties (known as “licensees”) who conduct their own business utilizing the licensed marks.

While “licensing” relationships, without question, possess a legitimate purpose, they are extremely limited and cannot serve as an “end-run” around franchise regulation. That is, license agreements cannot be used to create “franchise-type relationships” without the franchise regulation. The reason for this is simple: in the world of franchise regulation, “substance” matters more than “form”, labels do not matter and just because you call something a “license” does not mean that it is not a “franchise”. In short, your license agreement (no matter what you call it) may in fact be a franchise.

So, how do you determine if your license agreement “crosses the line”? You ignore titles such as “licensor”, “licensee”, “license fee” and “license agreement” and evaluate the “substance” of your business relationship. Under the federal Franchise Rule, the defining characteristics of a franchise include:

(1) Continuing Commercial Relationship.  a “continuing commercial relationship”;

(2) Agreement. a written or oral “agreement”;

(3) License. the “license” of a trademark;

(4) Control / Obligation to Support. “significant control” over your “licensees/franchisees” methods of operation, or, an obligation to “support” those operations, and

(5) Fee. the payment of a “fee”.

Since, factors (1), (2) and (3) are, by necessity, inherent to both franchise and license agreements, the determination as to whether or not your license agreement “crosses the line” into franchise territory, boils down to an evaluation of “control” and “fees”. That is:

• Will you possess significant control over your “licensee’s” methods of operation, or, in the alternative, are you obligated to provide significant support to your “licensee’s” operations? and

• Will you receive or be owed a fee as a condition for your “licensee” to commence its operations?

If the answer to both of these questions is “yes” or “possibly yes”, your “licensee” may actually be a “franchisee” and you may be subject to franchise regulation. When making this evaluation, you must go beyond labels and consider both the substance of the relationship that your are creating and the long-term goals that you are attempting to achieve.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks (1)
• Share Link

You have identified a franchise concept that you are extremely interested in.  You have met with the franchisor’s sales staff, completed an application and are impressed, so far, by what you see. However, before taking that next step, before paying a franchise fee or signing a franchise agreement, contact existing franchisees to get the “inside track”. 

Where do you get existing franchisee information?  In the franchisor’s disclosure  document (also known as the “FDD” and formally known as a Uniform Franchise  Offering Circular) that must be provided to you by the franchisor at least 14  calendar days prior to you signing a franchise agreement or paying any fee to  the franchisor.  The FDD is an extensive document and, quite frankly, one of the few “life-lines”  that will be available to help you make a true assessment of the franchise opportunity that you are considering. The legally mandated information contained in the FDD, and thereby disclosed to you as a prospective franchisee, is extensive, extremely relevant and should be reviewed with both a franchise lawyer and business accountant.  However, sticking to the point of this article, that is obtaining information from existing franchisees, please know the following:

• Item “20” titled “Outlets and Franchisee Information” should contain extensive information about (a) existing franchisees - including their names, addresses and contact information, (b) the number of franchise outlets in operation (at least as of the date of the FDD), (c) the number of franchise outlets that are expected to open within the next fiscal year, and (d) the number of franchise outlets that were closed, sold or terminated in the last fiscal year;

• Contact existing franchisees (not just the “star” – multi-unit franchisees who the franchisor suggests you speak with) and politely ask them about their experiences as a franchisee, the support given to them, the quality of the product (or service) and, if possible, the cash flow and profitability of the business;

• Pay particular attention to the number of franchise outlets closed, terminated or sold during the past year.  If there are a significant number (relative to total overall outlets) of closed, terminated and/or sold outlets, proceed with caution and ask lots of questions. Please keep in mind that while it may be inevitable to have a few closed outlets due to a “franchisee’s mismanagement or lack of effort”, look out for a pattern of closings, terminations and outlet sales and do not just accept an explanation blaming a closed outlet on a franchisee’s lack of effort.  In many cases, a closed outlet may be a function of neglect by both the franchisor (in terms of support and product development) and the franchisee; and 

• If the franchisor is projecting a significant increase in the number of projected outlet openings (a projection that should be included in Section 20 of the FDD) question whether or not the franchisor possesses the managerial staff and infrastructure to properly support all of these new outlets.  

When purchasing a franchise, there is a lot to consider and, inevitability – like every entrepreneur, you are bound to make mistakes. However, by contacting existing (and terminated) franchisees you can learn from some of their mistakes and cut down on your own.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks (1)
• Share Link