Franchise Litigation: Preserving Your "Start-Up" Franchise System

An on-going and, almost, unavoidable reality that franchisors must continuously monitor, anticipate and evaluate relates to the prospect and threat of "franchisee litigation".  Established franchisors, typically, are well aware of this risk and understand the necessity of implementing  and following a strict franchisee compliance program designed to mitigate "litigation exposure" and keep legal fees in check.  However, many times, start-up franchisors are unaware of the "litigation risks" associated with franchising and the consequences for failing to implement the appropriate litigation procedures.

During the start-up phase of a franchise system (i.e., one, two or five years into selling franchises) start-up franchisors are extremely susceptible to the legal and financial risks associated with franchisees attempting to "break away" from the franchise system.  That is, where your initial group of franchisees attempt to "save money"  by attempting to terminate their franchise agreements (and their obligation to pay royalties) and invalidate their non-compete covenants  under the pretext of an alleged default and fraud associated with the franchise relationship (i.e., where the franchisees claim that you have failed to meet your obligations as a franchisor and fraudulently induced them into becoming franchisees).  From a tactical standpoint, this franchisee "break away" type litigation is typically funded by wealthy franchisees who have experienced success with their franchises and are looking to establish a competing business and/or franchise system.  Some factors that start-up franchisors should consider, include:

  • Be Aware of Economic Imbalances with Franchisees - Although franchises should only be sold to competent and responsible individuals with sufficient assets and capital, be aware of "millionaire" franchisees who are looking to become your "partner".  These individuals have typically experienced success in other industries, may be experienced with the "business advantages" that litigation sometimes affords and possess the capital to overwhelm a start-up franchisor with limited funds. 
  • Be Diligent about the Enforcement of your Franchise Agreements - From day one of the franchisor-franchisee relationship you must enforce each and every provision of your franchise agreement.  Franchisee non-compliance must be immediatly addressed and remedied.  
  • Uniformly Enforce your Franchise Agreements - Ensure that you uniformly enforce your franchise agreement.  If there is disparity in the treatment of your franchisees (i.e., where you excuse one franchisee from performing a obligation performed by and enforced against other franchisees) , you will be exposing your franchise system to unnecessary franchisee claims.
  • Act Promptly to Enforce Non-Competition Covenants Contained in Your Franchise Agreement.  When faced with "rogue" franchisees who attempt to operate a competing business (under the pretext that they terminated their franchise relationship) you must immediatly review with your franchise lawyer the necessity of  commencing litigation and filing an emergency motion for injunctive relief.  

The "best litigation" is the litigation that is avoided.  Ensure that you implement franchisee compliance programs focused on the diligent enforcement of well defined procedures and obligations both on your part as the franchisor and on the part of your franchisees.

Consequences of a Failed Franchise: Learning Points for Prospective Franchisees

For existing franchisees and individuals considering the purchase of a franchise,anextremely instructive - but unfortunate - discussion appeared on the question and answer section of CNNMoney's Small Business website.  In the article, "Escaping a franchise deal gone bad", the franchisee of a children's entertainment franchise inquired about her legal options following what appears to have been the unsuccessful launch of her business.  In the article, the franchisee mentions a couple of important factors/issues that all prospective and current franchisees should consider:

Issue I  - Insure that You Possess Adequate Capital before Committing to a Franchise, In the article the franchisee mentions that to open the franchise, she needed $250,000.00 in capital.  She attributes a portion of her failure to her inability to raise adequate capital.  However, this franchisee readily admits that she did not "attempt" to raise capital until after paying her franchise fee and signing the franchise agreement.

  • How this Issue Should be Approached by Prospective Franchisees - Do not commit to a franchise agreement or pay a franchise fee until you are certain that you will have access to adequate capital.  If this cannot be determined until you sign a franchise agreement then speak with your attorney about making the franchise agreement (and the payment or refund-ability of your franchise fee) conditional and subject to obtaining a specified amount of financing. 

Issue II - Be Cautious with "Light or Express" Versions of a Full Service Franchise Concept, Although specifics are lacking in the article, the franchisee mentions that since she did not possess the recommended level of capital, she was permitted by the franchisor to open a "smaller version of the franchise".

  • How this Issue Should be Approached by Prospective Franchisees - Do not consider a "light" version of any full-service franchise concept unless the "light version" has been tested and successful in the marketplace.  In other words, don't become a Ginnie pig in an experiment where your life savings and financial stability is at stake.  Also, be cautious of any franchisor who is willing to modify the established capital criteria and requirements.

Issue III - Be Cautious of Post-Termination Restrictive Covenants and Obligations, The franchisee mentions that she is looking to get her money back and set up her own, non-franchised, competing business.  

  • How this Issue Should be Approached by Prospective Franchisees - Initially it is critical to recognize that, as a franchisee, your obligations (including your non-compete) will, in most instances under most franchise agreements, exist for a set duration commencing from the date of termination of your franchise.  This is a critical and important protection necessary for franchisors to preserve the integrity of their franchise system.  For the prospective franchisee you must recognize - before signing a franchise agreement - that once you become a franchisee, your future actions will be restricted.  Always obtain a clear understanding as to the scope and extent of these restrictions.

For current franchisees who find themselves in a similar situation, the article offers some good advice from Ed Teixeira of franchiseknowhow and attorney Robin Day Glenn. For prospective franchisees, the critical factor remains "look before you leap", consult with an experienced franchise lawyer and do your homework.